- Behringer dcx2496 ultradrive pro digital crossover driver#
- Behringer dcx2496 ultradrive pro digital crossover manual#
- Behringer dcx2496 ultradrive pro digital crossover mods#
However, since I had it, I used only modded DCX from then on, never compared it again, until modded DCX failed two months ago. It was easy to hear the difference with the same settings on the first listen, but I was not sure is it only difference in tonality or an improvement. I then bought heavily modified DCX (I can say which one, no problem). It was fine but could not ignore of all those promises with modded ones anymore. For a first couple of months I used stock one. I have DCX based system for five years now. For many, DCX remains an attractive active crossover option. The ability to assign long delays is handy to time align a 3 way system which includes subs. However, DCX does come with 6 channels and digital inputs as well as a warranty as a plug and play unit.
I generally recommend that people first consider MiniDSP as it will often work out cheaper and more flexible. I have not tested this after hearing it, but if you plan to run digital inputs, this is worth investigating. I have been told by one who has tested it, that this does not necessarily mean it is actually clipping, and the outputs should be also observed. You can input both SPDIF and AES EBU digital inputs, but the former can cause the input clip lights to run into the red. Using a digital input is not as straightforward as you might like. We did find that MiniDSP did appear to have a very slight edge, with a lower noise floor and a little more treble detail, however not everyone was able to hear it.
Behringer dcx2496 ultradrive pro digital crossover mods#
Although the mods cost twice the price of the unit itself, we could not pick a difference. In our comparison we compared the stock unit to a heavily modified unit. I consider the sonics of this unit to be decent and it held up relatively well to critical comparison. I have not had a problem with my unit, however, the experiences of others suggest that the reliability could be better. The rack mount ears give it a PA look so that it doesn't look at home in an audio rack. Behringer is imprinted on the top of the box in big bold white letters, the front face is very utilitarian with bright flashing lights all over. The build quality of this unit is fair, but the aesthetics are one of it's main weaknesses in a home system. Overall it's one of the easiest active crossover units to use.
Behringer dcx2496 ultradrive pro digital crossover manual#
Time alignment can be done very quickly compared to other manual methods. It's very easy to adjust the bass level quickly, if you find that one particular album is bass shy.Īdjustments are all done in real time so you can hear their impact right away. Using dynamic EQ can easily reduce bass dynamics.ĭCX is very easy to use once you have spent some time working out how the user interface works. In my system, the tweeter and mid are delayed by 8 metres to align them with the subs.ĭynamic limiting and EQ features are available, however I don't use these as I've found they can easily do more harm than good.
Behringer dcx2496 ultradrive pro digital crossover driver#
Contrary to popular belief, physically aligning driver voice coils doesn't generally time align a speaker correctly. This feature, with input from a microphone, applies digital delay so that a speaker is time aligned. In the past I had used Ultracurve for this, however, if you run out of EQ options with DCX, you're probably trying to overdo it. While primarily intended for active crossovers, it has enough EQ functions to tame room modes as well with parametric EQ. I believe it to be a relatively transparent device with decent noise floor performance and a good mix of features.ĭCX is a well featured unit. I have used DCX for some time in various DIY speaker projects and as previously mentioned, carefully compared it to other competitive units. Elsewhere in this blog, I've compared various active crossovers and also reported on my findings from subjective comparisons over two separate days with a small group:
0 kommentar(er)
